[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180413162644.bej6yrgmqc2y3nfe@holly.lan>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:26:44 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with
gpiod_get_direction
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:32:16AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > The documentation was wrong, gpiod_get_direction() returns 0/1 instead
> > > of the GPIOF_* flags. The docs were fixed with commit 94fc73094abe47
> > > ("gpio: correct docs about return value of gpiod_get_direction"). Now,
> > > fix this user (until a better, system-wide solution is in place).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
> >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > * rebased to top-of-linus-tree
> > > * added tag from Daniel, thanks!
> > >
> > > Through which tree does this need to go?
>
> I think Daniel Thompson has one ...
Sorry, I didn't spot the question at the bottom of the change block.
For backlight patches generally go though Lee Jones' tree.
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists