linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-usb2: Add support to override tuning values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0488f08e-20f9-a38d-a8bf-544a09d5c8a3@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:06:40 +0530
From:   Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-usb2: Add support to
 override tuning values

Hi,


On 4/13/2018 2:17 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Thanks for review Rob. I too agree with both the viewpoints.
>> Doug, if it is not of much concern then can I stick with current approach?
> I certainly would appreciate the #defines and believe they add to the
> readability, but if you're dead set against it and Rob says it's OK, I
> won't yell too loudly.
>
Agree to the readability part. Will add #defines as you suggested.
-thanks

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project