[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHcwAbTEjs6+oPYRJ1HTj--Xh6tORygYUL6aU9tMOJ1KHP_eKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:36:20 +0200
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...hat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Xavier Deguillard <xdeguillard@...are.com>,
pv-drivers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gil Kupfer <gilkup@...il.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"ldu@...hat.com" <ldu@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmw_balloon: fixing double free when batching mode is off
Hello.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko
<oleksandr@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Actually, rechecking the bug description, I might have rushed. The bug that
>> I encountered is related to the vunmap() but it is only caused when batching
>> is off, while the bug you reported has batching on.
>>
>> It seems that your sources support batching but do not include b91f108a3d54
>> (“VMware balloon: Treat init like reset”), which I think would have solved
>> the problem. I don’t see a mainline kernel that supports batching and does
>> not have this patch, so it would be helpful to see the exact module that you
>> use.
>
> Correct. The hash is d7568c130d0d0ff1fc5b364fc879b91f108a3d54, actually, though.
> Yes, we miss this commit in our code base, but also we've already
> provided a test kernel
> with this commit included to the customer. Unfortunately, we have no answer yet.
At least for one customer I can confirm that the kernel built with
both d7568c130 and the proposed patch fixes the issue.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
Senior Software Maintenance Engineer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists