[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A518FF77-554C-40E0-8656-5BEFA57C7A8E@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:54:21 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Xavier Deguillard <xdeguillard@...are.com>,
pv-drivers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gil Kupfer <gilkup@...il.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"ldu@...hat.com" <ldu@...hat.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmw_balloon: fixing double free when batching mode is
off
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko
> <oleksandr@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> Actually, rechecking the bug description, I might have rushed. The bug that
>>> I encountered is related to the vunmap() but it is only caused when batching
>>> is off, while the bug you reported has batching on.
>>>
>>> It seems that your sources support batching but do not include b91f108a3d54
>>> (“VMware balloon: Treat init like reset”), which I think would have solved
>>> the problem. I don’t see a mainline kernel that supports batching and does
>>> not have this patch, so it would be helpful to see the exact module that you
>>> use.
>>
>> Correct. The hash is d7568c130d0d0ff1fc5b364fc879b91f108a3d54, actually, though.
>> Yes, we miss this commit in our code base, but also we've already
>> provided a test kernel
>> with this commit included to the customer. Unfortunately, we have no answer yet.
>
> At least for one customer I can confirm that the kernel built with
> both d7568c130 and the proposed patch fixes the issue.
Greg,
Can you commit please this patch? Preferably for 4.17?
There is one minor mistake in the commit message - this patch fixes
f220a80f0c2e and not as written. Please let me know if you want a v3 or can
amend it while committing.
Thanks,
Nadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists