[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180416092444.05ec6434@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:24:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: add missing forward declaration
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:36:25 +0800
Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@...gle.com> wrote:
> Without this forward declaration compile may fail if this header is
> included only for registering other probe event without struct
> pool_workqueue.
>
Is this for new work or is there a config which this fails with today?
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> index 2f057a494d93..9a761bc6a251 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(workqueue_work,
> TP_printk("work struct %p", __entry->work)
> );
>
> +struct pool_workqueue;
> +
> /**
> * workqueue_queue_work - called when a work gets queued
> * @req_cpu: the requested cpu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists