[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEvWiR--DLM2Tp8-OaZSh4LV9o8x2K47c9=-+VZFoDhedy=nZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:18:47 +0000
From: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: add missing forward declaration
It does not fail with any config without this fix. This is for new work.
-- Ahbong
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:24 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:36:25 +0800
> Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Without this forward declaration compile may fail if this header is
> > included only for registering other probe event without struct
> > pool_workqueue.
> >
> Is this for new work or is there a config which this fails with today?
> -- Steve
> > Signed-off-by: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> > index 2f057a494d93..9a761bc6a251 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(workqueue_work,
> > TP_printk("work struct %p", __entry->work)
> > );
> >
> > +struct pool_workqueue;
> > +
> > /**
> > * workqueue_queue_work - called when a work gets queued
> > * @req_cpu: the requested cpu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists