[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bee7c8b15b7cec3d4b1442f414e766539fac2491.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:49:12 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...had.com" <mingo@...had.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"rajatja@...gle.com" <rajatja@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] trace: events: scsi: Add tag in SCSI trace
events
On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 14:31 +0000, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> TP_printk("host_no=%u channel=%u id=%u lun=%u data_sgl=%u prot_sgl=%u" \
> - " prot_op=%s cmnd=(%s %s raw=%s)",
> + " prot_op=%s tag=%d cmnd=(%s %s raw=%s)",
>
> [ ... ]
> TP_printk("host_no=%u channel=%u id=%u lun=%u data_sgl=%u prot_sgl=%u" \
> - " prot_op=%s cmnd=(%s %s raw=%s) rtn=%d",
> + " prot_op=%s tag=%d cmnd=(%s %s raw=%s) rtn=%d",
> [ ... ]
> TP_printk("host_no=%u channel=%u id=%u lun=%u data_sgl=%u " \
> - "prot_sgl=%u prot_op=%s cmnd=(%s %s raw=%s) result=(driver=" \
> - "%s host=%s message=%s status=%s)",
> + "prot_sgl=%u prot_op=%s tag=%d cmnd=(%s %s raw=%s) " \
> + "result=(driver=%s host=%s message=%s status=%s)",
Which tools process these strings? Has it been verified whether or not
the tools that process these strings still work fine with this patch
applied?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists