[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51266d3243acdf73e800a0d283473cc85a52a388.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:49:52 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...had.com" <mingo@...had.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"rajatja@...gle.com" <rajatja@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 2/2] trace: events: block: Add tag in block
trace events
On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 14:33 +0000, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> [ ... ]
> - TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u [%d]",
> + TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u tag=%d [%d]",
> [ ... ]
> - TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u [%d]",
> + TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u tag=%d [%d]",
> [ ... ]
Which tools process these strings? Has it been verified whether or not
the tools that process these strings still work fine with this patch
applied?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists