linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: stm32: sai: add support of iec958 controls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180417111733.GG8973@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:17:33 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@...com>
Cc:     "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
        "rmk@....linux.org.uk" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
        "jsarha@...com" <jsarha@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: stm32: sai: add support of iec958 controls

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:29:17AM +0000, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:

> I guess the blocking patch in this patchset is the patch "add IEC958 
> channel status control helper". This patch has been reviewed several 
> times, but did not get a ack so far.
> If you think these helpers will not be merged, I will reintegrate the 
> corresponding code in stm driver.
> Please let me know, if I need to prepare a v2 without helpers, or if we 
> can go further in the review of iec helpers patch ?

I don't mind either way but you're right here, I'm waiting for Takashi
to review the first patch.  I'd probably be OK with it just integrated
into the driver if we have to go that way though.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)