linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: stm32: sai: add support of iec958 controls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dcd08b5c-fc92-4b5d-6950-45afe9db3317@st.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 13:03:44 +0000
From:   Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@...com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>
CC:     "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
        "rmk@....linux.org.uk" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
        "jsarha@...com" <jsarha@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: stm32: sai: add support of iec958 controls

Hello Takashi,

On 04/17/2018 01:17 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:29:17AM +0000, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:
> 
>> I guess the blocking patch in this patchset is the patch "add IEC958
>> channel status control helper". This patch has been reviewed several
>> times, but did not get a ack so far.
>> If you think these helpers will not be merged, I will reintegrate the
>> corresponding code in stm driver.
>> Please let me know, if I need to prepare a v2 without helpers, or if we
>> can go further in the review of iec helpers patch ?
> 
> I don't mind either way but you're right here, I'm waiting for Takashi
> to review the first patch.  I'd probably be OK with it just integrated
> into the driver if we have to go that way though.
> 

Kind reminder.
Would you have some comments on this patchset ?

Thanks
olivier