linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/x86: Update syscall trace events to handle new x86 syscall func names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180418152536.GD10084@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:25:36 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/x86: Update syscall trace events to handle
 new x86 syscall func names

Em Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:17:16 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > This does the trick, by not using the main syscall routine, but one
> > called from it and not renamed, should work with older kernels.
> > 
> > This test should be improved to look if the desired routine is in place,
> > if not just skip the test and tell about the unavailability of the
> > wanted function, but that is for later.
> 
> Does this mean you can give me a "Tested-by" for that last patch?

Here it is, just written down:

Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

- Arnaldo