[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180418112033.65632fef@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:20:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/x86: Update syscall trace events to handle
new x86 syscall func names
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:17:16 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> This does the trick, by not using the main syscall routine, but one
> called from it and not renamed, should work with older kernels.
>
> This test should be improved to look if the desired routine is in place,
> if not just skip the test and tell about the unavailability of the
> wanted function, but that is for later.
Does this mean you can give me a "Tested-by" for that last patch?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists