linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/ldt: Fix support_pte_mask filtering in map_ldt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180419141134.GI15462@8bytes.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:11:34 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ldt: Fix support_pte_mask filtering in
 map_ldt_struct()

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> fb43d6cb91ef x86/mm: Do not auto-massage page protections <--- NOT OK

Hmm, that hunk from above patch looks suspicious:

-               set_pgd(pgd + pgd_index(restore_jump_address), __pgd(__pa(pud) | _KERNPG_TABLE));
+               pgd_t new_pgd = __pgd(__pa(p4d) | pgprot_val(pgtable_prot));
+               set_pgd(pgd + pgd_index(restore_jump_address), new_pgd);

The old code used __pa(pud) while the new one uses __pa(p4d).

Boris, can you change that back to __pa(pud) and test please?


Thanks,

	Joerg