[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180419145832.5mq3va53swswajmu@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:58:32 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ldt: Fix support_pte_mask filtering in
map_ldt_struct()
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:11:34PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > fb43d6cb91ef x86/mm: Do not auto-massage page protections <--- NOT OK
>
> Hmm, that hunk from above patch looks suspicious:
>
> - set_pgd(pgd + pgd_index(restore_jump_address), __pgd(__pa(pud) | _KERNPG_TABLE));
> + pgd_t new_pgd = __pgd(__pa(p4d) | pgprot_val(pgtable_prot));
> + set_pgd(pgd + pgd_index(restore_jump_address), new_pgd);
>
> The old code used __pa(pud) while the new one uses __pa(p4d).
>
> Boris, can you change that back to __pa(pud) and test please?
I had the same problem with v4.17-rc1 and fb43d6cb91ef and the change
you suggested applied on top of
(a) fb43d6cb91ef with cherry-picked e6f39e87b643
(b) current master (87ef12027b9b)
fixes the resume on my system.
Michal Kubecek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists