lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9023506.UBh6vynRGa@delfion>
Date:   Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:13:35 +0200
From:   Ferry Toth <ftoth@...fort.nl>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: DOS by unprivileged user

It appears any ordinary user can easily create a DOS on linux.

One sure way to reproduce this is to open gitk on the linux kernel repo 
(SIC) on a machine with 8GB RAM 16 GB swap on a HDD with btrfs and quad core 
+ hyperthreading. But I will be easy enough to get the same effect with more 
RAM, other fs etc.

In this case gitk allocates more and more memory (until my system freezes 
6.5GB of 7.5GB avaiable), the system starts swapping or writing to tmp files 
(can't investigate as there is no time until it freezes) and the io wait 
goes to 100% on all cores. At this point it is impossible to login from 
remote and local keyboard and mouse are frozen. Hard reset is the only way 
out at this point.

IMHO there is something wrong in how the kernel hands out resources, in this 
case memory, CPU time and disk accesses. It should be easily measurable that 
a single application is allocating all memory and consequently all CPU time 
is spent in io wait. I'm pretty sure that if the kernel would stop or reduce 
allocating CPU time to the hogging (user) process causing excessive io wait, 
the machine would continue just fine. And probably a single process should 
not even be allowed to allocate this amount of memory. Or at least should 
not force other applications to get swapped out.

In effect gitk should have beeb forced to run slow or be killed off (which 
doesn't happen because probably the kernel itself doesn't receive enough CPU 
time).

As a positive side effect maybe someone would dig into gitk and make it less 
memory hungry (qgit is half as hungry, still a lot).

-- 
Ferry Toth


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ