[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180420070257.GJ19578@uranus.lan>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:02:57 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] prctl: Deprecate non PR_SET_MM_MAP operations
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:38:09AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/05/18 21:26), Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [..]
> > -
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> > if (opt == PR_SET_MM_MAP || opt == PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE)
> > return prctl_set_mm_map(opt, (const void __user *)addr, arg4);
> > #endif
> >
> > - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> > - return -EPERM;
> > -
> > - if (opt == PR_SET_MM_EXE_FILE)
> > - return prctl_set_mm_exe_file(mm, (unsigned int)addr);
> > -
> > - if (opt == PR_SET_MM_AUXV)
> > - return prctl_set_auxv(mm, addr, arg4);
>
> Then validate_prctl_map() and prctl_set_mm_exe_file() can be moved
> under CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE ifdef.
I don't mind. Could you please make the patch on top of linux-next?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists