[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWeROfJNvUtfooN8gqA+nTRXhVLvQFpc-xiqUbG9XgcmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:11:34 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] regulator: bd9571mwv: Add support for DDR backup mode
Hi Lee,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> The ROHM BD9571MWV PMIC on the Renesas Salvator-X(S) and ULCB
>> development boards supports DDR Backup Power, which means that the DDR
>> power rails can be kept powered while the main SoC is powered down.
>
> Should this set be applied together, or can the MFD patches be applied
> on their own, without the Regulator patch?
The regulator patch depends on the MFD patches, so it's best for them to
go in together.
> If the former, then we're going to need an Ack from Mark.
Alternative, as you've already supplied (some form of) your Ack for the firs
3 patches, they can go in through Mark? All of it is enhancing the
regulator part.
I don't care much which path the patches take, though.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists