linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] regulator: bd9571mwv: Add support for DDR backup mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180420085826.4omlf2rrwuno3mtj@dell>
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:58:26 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] regulator: bd9571mwv: Add support for DDR backup
 mode

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> The ROHM BD9571MWV PMIC on the Renesas Salvator-X(S) and ULCB
> >> development boards supports DDR Backup Power, which means that the DDR
> >> power rails can be kept powered while the main SoC is powered down.
> >
> > Should this set be applied together, or can the MFD patches be applied
> > on their own, without the Regulator patch?
> 
> The regulator patch depends on the MFD patches, so it's best for them to
> go in together.
> 
> > If the former, then we're going to need an Ack from Mark.
> 
> Alternative, as you've already supplied (some form of) your Ack for the firs
> 3 patches, they can go in through Mark? All of it is enhancing the
> regulator part.

Yes, that's fine too:

Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog