[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68e84967-ca29-0b86-027a-76307e003a55@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:51:05 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: s390 perf events JSONs query
Hi Hendrik, Thomas,
I noticed that in 4.17-rc1 support was included for s390 perf
pmu-events. I also notice that the JSONs contain many common (identical
actually) events between different chips for this arch.
Support was added for factoring out common arch events in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/tools/perf/pmu-events?h=next-20180420&id=e9d32c1bf0cd7a98358ec4aa1625bf2b3459b9ac
ARM64 chips use this feature. I am not familiar with the s390 arch, but
do you think you could also use this feature?
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists