[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a3d9a3c0-8251-c922-64d4-6b91fe5df324@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 13:44:15 +0200
From: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: s390 perf events JSONs query
On 04/20/2018 12:51 PM, John Garry wrote:
> Hi Hendrik, Thomas,
>
> I noticed that in 4.17-rc1 support was included for s390 perf pmu-events. I also notice that the JSONs contain many common (identical actually) events between different chips for this arch.
>
> Support was added for factoring out common arch events in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/tools/perf/pmu-events?h=next-20180420&id=e9d32c1bf0cd7a98358ec4aa1625bf2b3459b9ac
>
> ARM64 chips use this feature. I am not familiar with the s390 arch, but do you think you could also use this feature?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
Thanks John,
for bringing this to my attention. Yes I will definitely look into this feature and will try to
rework our s390 json files when this seems beneficial.
I did not notice this patch on the linux-perf-users mailing list. Was it there for review?
I do ask this because recently I have nearly no traffic on this list in my reader, so I wonder
if there is something wrong with my mailing list subscription or setup.
Thanks.
--
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM LTC Boeblingen Germany
--
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Powered by blists - more mailing lists