linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc128s052: add ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180421170505.60d7784a@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 21 Apr 2018 17:05:05 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
Cc:     Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Dan O'Donovan <dan@...tex.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc128s052: add ACPI _HID AANT1280

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 14:20:36 +0100
Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com> wrote:

> From: Nicola Lunghi <nicola.lunghi@...tex.com>
> 
> ACPI _HID AANT1280 matches an ADC124S101 present on the UP Squared board
> that is compatible with adc128s052.
> 
> Add it to the driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Lunghi <nicola.lunghi@...tex.com>
> [javier@...tex.com: fix up commit message and one checkpatch warning]
> Signed-off-by: Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
Hi Javier,

This is in principle fine, but I'd like to see it done somewhat more
explicitly.

1) Add the adc124s101 and similar families to the driver first. I think
   this is just a case of IDs for all of
   adc124s051 and adc124s101.

2) Add the ACPI ID as you have done here.

That way we at least reflect clearly that the part is supported rather than
just in a comment on the ACPI ID.

Hmm. Looking at it, we should perhaps revisit whether some of these
TI parts are similar enough that their drivers can be cleanly combined.
A job for another day!

Jonathan


> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> index 56ec04d1c68f..917273f1268c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  
>  struct adc128_configuration {
>  	const struct iio_chan_spec	*channels;
> @@ -136,9 +137,22 @@ static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>  	struct adc128 *adc;
> -	int config = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;
> +	int config;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (ACPI_COMPANION(&spi->dev)) {
> +		const struct acpi_device_id *ad_id;
> +
> +		ad_id = acpi_match_device(spi->dev.driver->acpi_match_table,
> +					  &spi->dev);
> +		if (!ad_id)
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		config = ad_id->driver_data;
> +	} else {
> +		config = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;
> +	}
> +
>  	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*adc));
>  	if (!indio_dev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -199,10 +213,19 @@ static const struct spi_device_id adc128_id[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, adc128_id);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static const struct acpi_device_id adc128_acpi_match[] = {
> +	{ "AANT1280", 2 }, /* ADC124S021 compatible ACPI ID */
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "adc128s052",
>  		.of_match_table = adc128_of_match,
> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
>  	},
>  	.probe = adc128_probe,
>  	.remove = adc128_remove,