[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423083011.GP9198@localhost>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:30:11 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current
tree
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:04:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 63cb03f5c11e ("usb: core: split usb_phy_roothub_{init,alloc}")
>
> from the usb.current tree and commit:
>
> bc40f5341741 ("USB: core: hcd: drop support for legacy phys")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below - though I am not sure what happens to the
> phy_roothub allocation when usb_phy_roothub_init fails) and can carry
> the fix as necessary.
The resolution looks correct to me. The allocations done by
usb_phy_roothub_alloc() are device managed and would be freed on probe
failures (or unbind) so not explicit dealloc is needed. It might be a
good idea to indicate that in the function name however (i.e. to add a
devm_ prefix).
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists