[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180423095601.19d5d833f0260cede4b4c093@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:56:01 -0500
From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: set kernel end address properly
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:52:21 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:23:58PM -0500, Kim Phillips escreveu:
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 08:59:15 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > The map_groups__fixup_end() was called to set end addresses of kernel
> > > map and module maps. But now machine__create_modules() is set the end
> > > address of modules properly, the only remaining piece is the kernel map.
> > > We can set it with adjacent module's address directly instead of calling
> > > the map_groups__fixup_end(). If there's no module after the kernel map,
> > > the end address will be ~0ULL.
> > >
> > > Since it also changes the start address of the kernel map, it needs to
> > > re-insert the map to the kmaps in order to keep a correct ordering. Kim
> > > reported that it caused problems on ARM64.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
>
> So as you actually seem to have tested this, I'm taking this as a
> Tested-by instead, to better reflect what you did, ok?
Sure.
Thanks,
Kim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists