[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyM+Kru=ERDvccjVuMjSPbu+FQzjbUbMwSyEbL1rVGkBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:32:53 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault
in relay_signal.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Anton Ivanov
<anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 04/20/18 15:38, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Today user mode linux only works on x86 and x86_64 and this allows
>> simplifications of relay_signal.
>
>
> I believe someone recently fixed the ARM port. I have not had the time to
> try the fixes though.
Huh? UML is for ages x86 only.
--
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists