[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ddd238f-88a8-ed03-fe9e-0f4e5f2a490d@kot-begemot.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:44:22 +0100
From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault
in relay_signal.
Hi Richard,
There was a post to uml-devel during the days when the sourceforge
mailing list was working in random drop mode which claimed that "this
fixes the arm build".
I have not kept it locally and I do not see it the archive (I do not see
a few other posts there either - including some of mine).
The joys of having a broken list :(
Whoever posted it, if you are reading it, please re-post again so we can
have a look.
In the meantime we are as you said - x86 only.
A.
On 04/24/18 09:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Anton Ivanov
> <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 04/20/18 15:38, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Today user mode linux only works on x86 and x86_64 and this allows
>>> simplifications of relay_signal.
>>
>> I believe someone recently fixed the ARM port. I have not had the time to
>> try the fixes though.
> Huh? UML is for ages x86 only.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists