linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault in relay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:44:22 +0100
From:   Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault
 in relay_signal.

Hi Richard,

There was a post to uml-devel during the days when the sourceforge 
mailing list was working in random drop mode which claimed that "this 
fixes the arm build".

I have not kept it locally and I do not see it the archive (I do not see 
a few other posts there either - including some of mine).

The joys of having a broken list :(

Whoever posted it, if you are reading it, please re-post again so we can 
have a look.

In the meantime we are as you said - x86 only.

A.

On 04/24/18 09:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Anton Ivanov
> <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 04/20/18 15:38, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Today user mode linux only works on x86 and x86_64 and this allows
>>> simplifications of relay_signal.
>>
>> I believe someone recently fixed the ARM port. I have not had the time to
>> try the fixes though.
> Huh? UML is for ages x86 only.
>