linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: honor CLK_MUX_ROUND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1524650396.4026.55.camel@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:59:56 +0200
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: honor CLK_MUX_ROUND_CLOSEST in generic clk mux

On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 11:04 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> >   }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_mux_determine_rate_flags);
> > 
> 
> Why do we need to export this?

Because any driver implementing some type of mux may use this function, and the
driver could be a module. I have one in the pipe right now.

It is the same as __clk_determine_rate(), __clk_mux_determine_rate_closest()