[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c69ed57-94dd-45e1-bdd8-ac0c37bc575a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:27:31 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com,
zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com,
will.deacon@....com, ak@...ux.intel.com, agustinv@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event
alias in small groups
On 4/24/2018 3:29 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:23:06PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
>> On 4/24/2018 3:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20:13AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com escreveu:
>>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Perf stat doesn't count the uncore event aliases from the same uncore
>>>> block in a group, for example:
>>>
>>> This one is not applying to acme/perf/urgent, all the rest I got merged
>>> there, the last one with that change from using strstr() to a new bool
>>> in perf_evsel for the uniquifying operation having being performed.
>>
>> Sure. Thank you for letting me know.
>
> Just pushed what I have there,
>
Thanks Arnaldo.
How about this one?
Will it be applied to acme/perf/core? Or should I resend it for wider
review?
Thanks,
Kan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists