linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:59:07 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
        namhyung@...nel.org, ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com,
        zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com,
        will.deacon@....com, ak@...ux.intel.com, agustinv@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event
 alias in small groups

Em Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:27:31AM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> 
> 
> On 4/24/2018 3:29 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:23:06PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > On 4/24/2018 3:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20:13AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com escreveu:
> > > > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Perf stat doesn't count the uncore event aliases from the same uncore
> > > > > block in a group, for example:
> > > > 
> > > > This one is not applying to acme/perf/urgent, all the rest I got merged
> > > > there, the last one with that change from using strstr() to a new bool
> > > > in perf_evsel for the uniquifying operation having being performed.
> > > 
> > > Sure. Thank you for letting me know.
> > 
> > Just pushed what I have there,
> > 
> 
> Thanks Arnaldo.
> 
> How about this one?
> Will it be applied to acme/perf/core? Or should I resend it for wider
> review?

On acme/perf/urgent, please check

[acme@...enth perf]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch 
patching file tools/perf/util/evsel.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 127 (offset 1 line).
patching file tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
patching file tools/perf/util/parse-events.h
patching file tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
Hunk #3 FAILED at 232.
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tools/perf/util/parse-events.y.rej
[acme@...enth perf]$ cat tools/perf/util/parse-events.y.rej
--- tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
+++ tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config
 		YYABORT;
 
 	ALLOC_LIST(list);
-	if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2, false)) {
+	if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2, false, false)) {
 		struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
 		int ok = 0;
 		char *pattern;
[acme@...enth perf]$