linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77bce91b-8d92-3be2-e4d1-abbb7f4cc2dd@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:37:39 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with
 BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config

On 04/25/2018 04:14 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:25:47PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
>>
>> If we have concern for security issue, should we remove support for
>> 'bpf_jit_enable = 2' and modify the doc to reflect this change?
> 
> I suggest to fix the doc.

Agree, lets do that instead. Leo, could you cook a patch for that?

Thanks,
Daniel