linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180426022809.GD28567@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:28:09 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with
 BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 04/25/2018 04:14 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:25:47PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> >>
> >> If we have concern for security issue, should we remove support for
> >> 'bpf_jit_enable = 2' and modify the doc to reflect this change?
> > 
> > I suggest to fix the doc.
> 
> Agree, lets do that instead. Leo, could you cook a patch for that?

Sure, have sent new patch for this.

Thanks for suggestion!

> Thanks,
> Daniel