lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180426022809.GD28567@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:28:09 +0800 From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 04/25/2018 04:14 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:25:47PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > >> > >> If we have concern for security issue, should we remove support for > >> 'bpf_jit_enable = 2' and modify the doc to reflect this change? > > > > I suggest to fix the doc. > > Agree, lets do that instead. Leo, could you cook a patch for that? Sure, have sent new patch for this. Thanks for suggestion! > Thanks, > Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists