linux-kernel - [PATCH RT] seqlock: provide the same ordering semantics as mainline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180426200203.11560-1-julia@ni.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:02:03 -0500
From:   Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>,
        <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <stable-rt@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT] seqlock: provide the same ordering semantics as mainline

The mainline implementation of read_seqbegin() orders prior loads w.r.t.
the read-side critical section.  Fixup the RT writer-boosting
implementation to provide the same guarantee.

Also, while we're here, update the usage of ACCESS_ONCE() to use
READ_ONCE().

Fixes: e69f15cf77c23 ("seqlock: Prevent rt starvation")
Cc: stable-rt@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
---
Found during code inspection of the RT seqlock implementation.

   Julia

 include/linux/seqlock.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index a59751276b94..597ce5a9e013 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(seqlock_t *sl)
 	unsigned ret;
 
 repeat:
-	ret = ACCESS_ONCE(sl->seqcount.sequence);
+	ret = READ_ONCE(sl->seqcount.sequence);
 	if (unlikely(ret & 1)) {
 		/*
 		 * Take the lock and let the writer proceed (i.e. evtl
@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(seqlock_t *sl)
 		spin_unlock_wait(&sl->lock);
 		goto repeat;
 	}
+	smp_rmb();
 	return ret;
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.16.1