lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e927f7f-fa84-1792-b80e-bf5679e71bcf@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:01:59 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: change order of qid and cmdid in completion trace

On 4/26/18 1:49 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Keith reported that command submission and command completion
> tracepoints have the order of the cmdid and qid fileds swapped.
> 
> While it isn't easily possible to change the command submission
> tracepoint, as there is a regression test parsing it in blktests we
> can swap the command completion tracepoint to have the fileds aligned.

It also makes more sense to have qid before cmdid.

Also, fileds -> fields, in two spots.

With that:

Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ