[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152474045969.29458.5499629495380211357.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:00:59 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, oleg@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@...omium.org, riel@...hat.com,
mhocko@...e.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, marcos.souza.org@...il.com,
hoeun.ryu@...il.com, pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, gs051095@...il.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ktkhai@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] exit: Rename assign_new_owner label in
mm_update_next_owner()
Next patch introduces nolock variant of this label,
so we will have new_owner and new_owner_nolock.
assign_new_owner_nolock would be too long there.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 5c42a9b9c1d7..40f734ed1193 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
list_for_each_entry(c, &p->children, sibling) {
if (c->mm == mm)
- goto assign_new_owner;
+ goto new_owner;
}
/*
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
list_for_each_entry(c, &p->real_parent->children, sibling) {
if (c->mm == mm)
- goto assign_new_owner;
+ goto new_owner;
}
/*
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
continue;
for_each_thread(g, c) {
if (c->mm == mm)
- goto assign_new_owner;
+ goto new_owner;
if (c->mm)
break;
}
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
mm->owner = NULL;
return;
-assign_new_owner:
+new_owner:
rcu_read_lock();
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
BUG_ON(c == p);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists