[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180427121330.40b7ef15@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:13:30 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zilstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Fenguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Baohong Liu <baohong.liu@...el.com>,
Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@...el.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tracepoint: Introduce tracepoint callbacks
executing with preempt on
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:57:01 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > + if (preempt_on) { \
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()); /* no srcu from nmi */ \
>
> Very good on this check, thank you!
I think you need to return and not call the read lock.
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()))
return;
>
> > + idx = srcu_read_lock(&tracepoint_srcu); \
>
> Hmmm... Do I need to create a _notrace variant of srcu_read_lock()
> and srcu_read_unlock()?
I think so.
-- Steve
>
> > + it_func_ptr = srcu_dereference((tp)->funcs, \
> > + &tracepoint_srcu); \
> > + } else { \
> > + rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \
> > + it_func_ptr = \
> > + rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \
> > + } \
> > + \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists