linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] tracepoint: Introduce tracepoint callbacks executing with preempt on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJWu+oqcbdvnN=wdas9CYykCmqUKChnWWk6HScb=6VJO03eG4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:22:04 -0700
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zilstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Fenguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Baohong Liu <baohong.liu@...el.com>,
        Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@...el.com>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tracepoint: Introduce tracepoint callbacks executing
 with preempt on

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:57:01 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> > +           if (preempt_on) {                                       \
>> > +                   WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()); /* no srcu from nmi */  \
>>
>> Very good on this check, thank you!
>
> I think you need to return and not call the read lock.
>
>                         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()))
>                                 return;

Cool, I'll do that.

>>
>> > +                   idx = srcu_read_lock(&tracepoint_srcu);         \
>>
>> Hmmm...  Do I need to create a _notrace variant of srcu_read_lock()
>> and srcu_read_unlock()?
>
> I think so.

Oh yes, since otherwise we call into lockdep.

Paul, then I think that's true we'd need srcu _notrace variants that
don't do the rcu_lock_acquire. Sorry for my earlier email saying its
not needed. Thanks,

- Joel