lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:23:17 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To:     Bhadram Varka <vbhadram@...dia.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jingju Hou <Jingju.Hou@...aptics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: clear wol event before setting it

On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:22:34 +0530 Bhadram Varka wrote:

> Hi Andrew/Jisheng,
> 
> On 4/26/2018 6:10 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> hmm, so you want a "stick" WOL feature, I dunno whether Linux kernel
> >> requires WOL should be "stick".  
> > I see two different cases:
> >
> > Suspend/resume: The WoL state in the kernel is probably kept across
> > such a cycle. If so, you would expect another suspend/resume to also
> > work, without needs to reconfigure it.  
> Trying this scenario (suspend/resume) from my side. In this case WoL 
> should be enabled in the HW. For Marvell PHY to generate WoL interrupt 
> we need to clear WoL status.
> Above mentioned change required to make this happen. Please share your 
> thoughts on this.

I'm fine with that patch. Maybe you could send out a patch?

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists