linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a9448c11-2843-c82f-34d3-e9c96db346cf@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:55:33 +0200
From:   Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Martin Vuille <jpmv27@....com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
 for s390

On 04/26/2018 05:26 PM, Martin Vuille wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/26/18 04:09, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
>> was different. With you patch it changed from /usr/lib64/libc.so (old) to
>> /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug (new)
>>
> Thomas,
> 
> Can you tell me what 'file' reports for the old and new files?
> 
> Regards,
> MV
> 

Martin,

not sure I understand your question:

Before your patch the file which was picked by dwarf was
/usr/lib64/libc.so

With your patch file which was picked by dwarf was 
/usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug

Was this your question?
-- 
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz 
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294