lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:55:33 +0200 From: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com> To: Martin Vuille <jpmv27@....com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh for s390 On 04/26/2018 05:26 PM, Martin Vuille wrote: > > > On 04/26/18 04:09, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote: >> was different. With you patch it changed from /usr/lib64/libc.so (old) to >> /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug (new) >> > Thomas, > > Can you tell me what 'file' reports for the old and new files? > > Regards, > MV > Martin, not sure I understand your question: Before your patch the file which was picked by dwarf was /usr/lib64/libc.so With your patch file which was picked by dwarf was /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug Was this your question? -- Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany -- Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Powered by blists - more mailing lists