linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c524e59-d30f-de36-8622-5b756a666665@aim.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:31:47 -0400
From:   Martin Vuille <jpmv27@....com>
To:     Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
 for s390



On 04/27/18 03:55, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
> On 04/26/2018 05:26 PM, Martin Vuille wrote:
>>
>> On 04/26/18 04:09, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
>>> was different. With you patch it changed from /usr/lib64/libc.so (old) to
>>> /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug (new)
>>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Can you tell me what 'file' reports for the old and new files?
>>
>> Regards,
>> MV
>>
> Martin,
>
> not sure I understand your question:
>
> Before your patch the file which was picked by dwarf was
> /usr/lib64/libc.so
>
>
> With your patch file which was picked by dwarf was
> /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug
>
> Was this your question?
Thomas,

Apologies for being unclear in my request.

I was asking what the commands "file /usr/lib64/libc.so"
and "file /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug" report.

MV