[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180430132259.9938-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:22:59 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next][V2] pinctrl: actions: fix missing break in PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH case.
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
There is a missing break in case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH leading to
a fall-through to the PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE case that performs different
checks against *arg. This looks like an unintentional missing break so
add in the break.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468456, 1468459 ("Missing break in switch")
Fixes: 513d7a2f7e0f ("pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
index 928b40f71a3c..ee090697b1e9 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ static int owl_group_pinconf_arg2val(const struct owl_pingroup *g,
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
+ break;
case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
if (*arg)
*arg = OWL_PINCONF_SLEW_FAST;
@@ -441,6 +442,7 @@ static int owl_group_pinconf_val2arg(const struct owl_pingroup *g,
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
+ break;
case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
if (*arg)
*arg = 1;
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists