[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180430135149.mn4ywt6i73ocoobk@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:21:49 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] pinctrl: actions: fix missing break in
PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH case.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 02:22:59PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> There is a missing break in case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH leading to
> a fall-through to the PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE case that performs different
> checks against *arg. This looks like an unintentional missing break so
> add in the break.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468456, 1468459 ("Missing break in switch")
>
Thanks for fixing!
> Fixes: 513d7a2f7e0f ("pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Thanks,
Mani
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> index 928b40f71a3c..ee090697b1e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ static int owl_group_pinconf_arg2val(const struct owl_pingroup *g,
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> + break;
> case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
> if (*arg)
> *arg = OWL_PINCONF_SLEW_FAST;
> @@ -441,6 +442,7 @@ static int owl_group_pinconf_val2arg(const struct owl_pingroup *g,
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> + break;
> case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
> if (*arg)
> *arg = 1;
> --
> 2.17.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists