[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mf2TKsuiudxPdEFStrstHH65jHb6JFJ0Ort9GvWDSo9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:45:06 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] mtd: nand: davinci: stop using pdev->id as chipselect
2018-04-30 12:09 GMT+02:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>:
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:24:41 +0200
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>
>> We have the 'ti,davinci-chipselect' property in the device tree, but
>> when using platform data the driver silently uses the id field of
>> struct platform_device as the chipselect. This is confusing and we
>> almost broke the nand support again recently after converting the
>> platform to common clock framework (which changed the device id in the
>> clock lookup - the problem is gone now that we no longer acquire the
>> clock in the nand driver.
>>
>> This series adds a new field to davinci-nand platform data, then makes
>> all board use it and finally modifies the two drivers that make use of
>> it.
>>
>> Bartosz Golaszewski (12):
>> mtd: nand: davinci: store the core chipselect number in platform data
>
> Raw NAND related patches (that is, everything that is not onenand or
> SPI NAND) should use the "mtd: rawnand: " prefix now. Other than that,
> I'm fine with the patch series, just let me know how you want to have it
> merged (through the MTD tree or the davinci tree).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Boris
I think Sekhar could pick all those patches up for 4.18.
Sekhar - do you want me to resend the series with the commit message
changed as requested by Boris, or can you fix it when applying the
series?
Best regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists