[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1585317.VnK93dIYnt@amdc3058>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 11:39:20 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] thermal: exynos: move trips setting to
exynos_tmu_initialize()
On Tuesday, May 01, 2018 12:31:26 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:51:29PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > * Add dummy exynos4210_tmu_set_trip_hyst() helper.
> >
> > * Add ->tmu_set_trip_temp and ->tmu_set_trip_hyst methods to struct
> > exynos_tmu_data and set them in exynos_map_dt_data().
> >
> > * Move trips setting to exynos_tmu_initialize().
> >
> > There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > ---
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +/* failing thresholds are not supported on Exynos4210 */
> > +static void exynos4210_tmu_set_trip_hyst(struct exynos_tmu_data *data,
> > + int trip, u8 temp, u8 hyst)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
>
> May be you can get rid of this empty function and check against a NULL pointer
> in exynos_tmu_initialize ?
This is more a question of taste and I prefer adding this one dummy function
instead of adding NULL pointer check for all SoCs.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists