[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UDUKg58xe+3C5QUbFwFkO8d3c_tzxmfPDzdv1KXZ3W9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 09:37:15 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> +- vdd_l26-supply
> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
> + Usage: optional (PM8998 only)
> + Value type: <phandle>
> + Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
> + regulators for this PMIC.
One small additional nit here is that "vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply" is listed twice.
Also on the schematics (and in the PM8998 datasheet) I have this is
"VIN_LVS_1_2". It seems like you should be consistent here and call
this "vin-lvs-1-2-supply".
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists