linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel hacking: new config DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180505235725.hglh6u77spw55qa5@intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 May 2018 07:57:26 +0800
From:   "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        x86@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel hacking: new config DEBUG_EXPERIENCE to
 apply GCC -Og optimization

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 21:45:46 +0800
> "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > > With that gcc comment, I still think CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_DEBUG is more
> > > inline with what it is and understandable than
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE. The "OPTIMIZE" is the key word there.
> > > 
> > > -- Steve  
> > What about CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING? We alreay have
> > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE.
> 
> Yes I like that much better.
> 
> > 
> > And do we need to move it to existing configuration menu "General setup->
> > Compiler optimization level"? But I also want it appear in "kernel hacking"
> > since this is a debug option.
> 
> I understand why you would want it by debugging, but I think it does
> make more sense to be included with the above two other options, as
> they are all mutually exclusive.
> 
> This brings up the topic of creating config paradigms. That is, a way
> of saying "I want a debug kernel" and select one option that selects
> everything you would expect. Or perhaps we should have a:
> 
>  make debug_config
> 
Agree, I accomplish this by running script scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh.

> that does it.
> 
> But that's a different topic. For now, I would just included it in
> init/Kconfig, and not worry about it not showing up in kernel hacking.
> 
> 
> -- Steve

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du