linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel hacking: new config DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9dc6279b-767a-a4b1-75a9-aefdef61a224@infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 5 May 2018 17:27:06 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel hacking: new config DEBUG_EXPERIENCE to
 apply GCC -Og optimization

On 05/05/2018 04:57 PM, Du, Changbin wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 21:45:46 +0800
>> "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> With that gcc comment, I still think CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_DEBUG is more
>>>> inline with what it is and understandable than
>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE. The "OPTIMIZE" is the key word there.
>>>>
>>>> -- Steve  
>>> What about CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING? We alreay have
>>> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE.
>>
>> Yes I like that much better.
>>
>>>
>>> And do we need to move it to existing configuration menu "General setup->
>>> Compiler optimization level"? But I also want it appear in "kernel hacking"
>>> since this is a debug option.
>>
>> I understand why you would want it by debugging, but I think it does
>> make more sense to be included with the above two other options, as
>> they are all mutually exclusive.

mm, sounds good.

>> This brings up the topic of creating config paradigms. That is, a way
>> of saying "I want a debug kernel" and select one option that selects
>> everything you would expect. Or perhaps we should have a:
>>
>>  make debug_config

Sometimes I want to build allmodconfig-minus-debug options ... but not
all debug options.  I still want debugfs but most options that end with
_DEBUG are disabled.  I.e., I don't want the options that cause big
run-time slowdowns. (unless I cause that by printing some debugfs
contents)

Can merge_config.sh (or one of its cousins) help with that?

> Agree, I accomplish this by running script scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh.
> 
>> that does it.
>>
>> But that's a different topic. For now, I would just included it in
>> init/Kconfig, and not worry about it not showing up in kernel hacking.

Ack.


thanks.
-- 
~Randy