[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHtARFFEH3Q5BPL+36i_UHn5+yDfe8QyMQe_n-b1Q87fsZQOpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 17:27:24 -0700
From: adam radford <aradford@...il.com>
To: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@....edu>
Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: 3w-9xxx: fix a missing-check bug
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Wenwen Wang <wang6495@....edu> wrote:
> In twa_chrdev_ioctl(), the ioctl driver command is firstly copied from the
> userspace pointer 'argp' and saved to the kernel object 'driver_command'.
> Then a security check is performed on the data buffer size indicated by
> 'driver_command', which is 'driver_command.buffer_length'. If the security
> check is passed, the entire ioctl command is copied again from the 'argp'
> pointer and saved to the kernel object 'tw_ioctl'. Then, various operations
> are performed on 'tw_ioctl' according to the 'cmd'. Given that the 'argp'
> pointer resides in userspace, a malicious userspace process can race to
> change the buffer size between the two copies. This way, the user can
> bypass the security check and inject invalid data buffer size. This can
> cause potential security issues in the following execution.
>
> This patch checks the buffer size obtained in the second copy. An error
> code -EINVAL will be returned if it is not same as the original one in the
> first copy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@....edu>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c b/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c
> index b42c9c4..8bc43db 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c
> @@ -684,6 +684,12 @@ static long twa_chrdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long
> if (copy_from_user(tw_ioctl, argp, driver_command.buffer_length + sizeof(TW_Ioctl_Buf_Apache) - 1))
> goto out3;
>
> + if (tw_ioctl->driver_command.buffer_length
> + != driver_command.buffer_length) {
> + retval = TW_IOCTL_ERROR_OS_EINVAL;
> + goto out3;
> + }
> +
> /* See which ioctl we are doing */
> switch (cmd) {
> case TW_IOCTL_FIRMWARE_PASS_THROUGH:
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Drop this patch and create a new one that checks for: if
!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) in twa_chrdev_ioctl() (like 3w-sas.c does) and
I'll ack it.
-Adam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists