linux-kernel - Re: [v8] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add QCOM RPMh clock driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <152573930157.138124.12994299541712205183@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 07 May 2018 17:28:21 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v8] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add QCOM RPMh clock driver

Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-07 03:48:06)
> Hello Stephen,
> 
> Could you please let me know your comments on the below.
> 
> On 5/4/2018 10:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-04 03:02:38)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..944fe04
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct clk_rpmh_desc {
> >> +       struct clk_hw **clks;
> >> +       size_t num_clks;
> >> +};
> > 
> > This could be replaced with the clk_hw_onecell_data struct and then the
> > only problem becomes the const part which seems pretty impossible to fix
> > at this point. One "workaround" is to memdup the structure. Ugh.
> > 
> 
> Will be okay, if I can the following?
> 
> _probe...
> {
>         struct clk_rpmh_desc *hw_desc_data;
>         ....
> 
>         hw_desc_data = kmemdup(desc, sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
>         ...
>         ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(&pdev->dev,     of_clk_rpmh_hw_get, 
> hw_desc_data);
>          ....
> 
> }
> 
> And also I fix the "getter" function.

I'd rather see the check for out of bounds number just go away, unless
that's helping something. The kmemdup() doesn't look good.