[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvV8r8Bp6c2gZYhX1pOqDGHPDmURB6+x=09uR1diERUSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 16:57:04 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/35] ovl: add ovl_fsync()
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Implement stacked fsync().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> fs/overlayfs/file.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>> index a7af56861aa5..419aa3f9967b 100644
>> --- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>> @@ -233,10 +233,30 @@ static ssize_t ovl_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int ovl_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
>> +{
>> + struct fd real;
>> + const struct cred *old_cred;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>
> Don't sync non-upper. same as ovl_dir_fsync()
Ah, that was about EROFS returned by lower fsync, right?
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists