[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjyXLW3xHOtpjz0EnFGWk-TzEHTh5mdzH+jBbXDLpSRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 18:02:31 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/35] ovl: add ovl_fsync()
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> Implement stacked fsync().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/overlayfs/file.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>>> index a7af56861aa5..419aa3f9967b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>>> @@ -233,10 +233,30 @@ static ssize_t ovl_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int ovl_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
>>> +{
>>> + struct fd real;
>>> + const struct cred *old_cred;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>
>> Don't sync non-upper. same as ovl_dir_fsync()
>
> Ah, that was about EROFS returned by lower fsync, right?
>
Yap. to reason to try and sync a lower file.
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists