[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVNFAB-zJxhs3t+CxOdftssmWjMaS_bYuQDR+NcBGPRfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 14:36:27 +0000
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
francis.deslauriers@...icios.com,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] uprobes: x86: Reject probing MOV SS
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:58 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> I found the CVE-2018-1087 and CVE-2018-8897 should
> be related to kprobes and uprobes too, since both
> are using #DB for single stepping.
Seems okay to me. I doubt we have a security problem, but I can easily
imagine that the probes wouldn't work right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists